2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 962 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |
