2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 13 kg more than 1978 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1978 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2590 mm |