2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Holden Kingswood

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 3,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1979 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Holden Kingswood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 272 kg more than 1979 Holden Kingswood. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Holden Kingswood. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Holden Kingswood.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ranger 1979 Holden Kingswood
Make Ford Holden
Model Ranger Kingswood
Year Released 2004 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2983 cc 3296 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 221 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1642 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2830 mm