2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,184 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (116 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 202 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (264 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ranger 1980 Mercury Cougar
Make Ford Mercury
Model Ranger Cougar
Year Released 2004 1980
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 4184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 207 HP 116 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 323 Nm 264 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2690 mm