2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Nissan Prairie
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 660 kg more than 1982 Nissan Prairie.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Prairie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1982 Nissan Prairie | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Prairie |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1809 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |