2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 5 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 478 kg more than 1982 Renault 5.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1982 Renault 5 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |