2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Italdesign Nazca
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Italdesign Nazca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Italdesign Nazca would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Italdesign Nazca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Italdesign Nazca (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Italdesign Nazca (470 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (251 Nm). This means 1991 Italdesign Nazca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1991 Italdesign Nazca | |
| Make | Ford | Italdesign |
| Model | Ranger | Nazca |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 470 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2600 mm |
