2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 4,987 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Statesman (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 77 kg more than 1992 Holden Statesman.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Statesman (385 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (251 Nm). This means 1992 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1992 Holden Statesman | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Statesman |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 385 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2830 mm |