2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. (114 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 127 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1992 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Magna |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2730 mm |