2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Ranger | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2410 mm |