2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | B2500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 194 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2990 mm |