2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Space Runner |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |