2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Saturn LS
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Saturn LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Saturn LS would be higher.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Saturn LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Saturn LS has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Saturn LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 2000 Saturn LS | |
| Make | Ford | Saturn |
| Model | Ranger | LS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
