2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Pontiac Bonneville (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 12 kg more than 2001 Pontiac Bonneville.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Pontiac Bonneville (311 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (251 Nm). This means 2001 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2001 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 311 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 96.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |