2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Nissan Quest
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Quest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Quest would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Nissan Quest. (165 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan Quest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Quest weights approximately 612 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Nissan Quest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan Quest. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan Quest.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2002 Nissan Quest | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Quest |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 73 L |