2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Audi TT

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Audi TT. (161 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi TT weights approximately 102 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ranger 2003 Audi TT
Make Ford Audi
Model Ranger TT
Year Released 2004 2003
Body Type Pickup Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1781 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 207 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 323 Nm 235 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.3:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4010 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2430 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 55 L