2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Ranger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 59 L |