2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2010 Renault Koleos is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Koleos weights approximately 8 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2010 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Koleos |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 169 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2690 mm |