2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Ranger | Aveo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 155 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 46 L |