2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 2012 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Ranger | Combo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 52 L |
