2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,998 cc (24 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 20 kg more than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Outlander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2670 mm |