2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1949 Simca 8
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1949 Simca 8. (49 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 553 kg more than 1949 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (281 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Simca 8. (88 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Taurus | 1949 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Taurus | 8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1503 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |
