2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1958 Jeep CJ

To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 406 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (245 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Taurus 1958 Jeep CJ
Make Ford Jeep
Model Taurus CJ
Year Released 2004 1958
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 3687 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 155 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 326 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1586 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2060 mm