2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 600 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Taurus | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Taurus | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2290 mm |
