2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 625 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (251 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Ford | Wartburg |
Model | Taurus | 312 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |