2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 330 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (250 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Taurus | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Taurus | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |
