2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 357 kg more than 1979 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |