2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1987 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Mazda RX-7 (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Ford Taurus. (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Because 1987 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Mazda RX-7 (271 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1987 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1987 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2440 mm |