2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Taurus | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taurus | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |
