2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Taurus | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |