2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 585 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (251 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |