2004 Ford Taurus vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (281 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Taurus | 400 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |