2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Taurus | SSU |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |