2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden Maloo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden Maloo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taurus | Maloo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |