2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2001 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 307 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2001 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Taurus | 2001 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Taurus | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
