2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2004 Ford Taurus. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 115 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (250 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Taurus | Crossfire |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |