2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Ford Taurus. (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | MX-Flexa |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2760 mm |