2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Ford Taurus. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 60 kg more than 2004 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (250 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Taurus | BLS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 265 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |