2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (251 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Taurus | CR-V |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |