2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2012 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai i20.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (250 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai i20. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2012 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Ford | Hyundai |
Model | Taurus | i20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 17:01 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |