2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1958 GAZ M20
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 GAZ M20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 GAZ M20 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1958 GAZ M20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1958 GAZ M20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 252 kg more than 1958 GAZ M20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 GAZ M20. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 GAZ M20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1958 GAZ M20 | |
Make | Ford | GAZ |
Model | Thunderbird | M20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2710 mm |