2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 684 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Ford | Datsun |
Model | Thunderbird | 240Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11 L/100km |