2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 48 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. (369 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Thunderbird | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 502 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |