2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 701 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Thunderbird | Murena |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 81.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2440 mm |