2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1982 GMC Suburban
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1982 GMC Suburban. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1982 GMC Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 GMC Suburban weights approximately 478 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1982 GMC Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 GMC Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 GMC Suburban. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 GMC Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1982 GMC Suburban | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | Thunderbird | Suburban |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3932 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
