2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 882 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Thunderbird | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3932 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
