2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 672 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |