2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 893 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan CQ-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | CQ-X |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3934 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |