2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 242 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2790 mm |