2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,998 cc, 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 402 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Ford | Spyker |
Model | Thunderbird | C8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 3998 cc |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |